umm, i tried posting this remotely and it failed. trying again. this
was for april 11...
> So, I just finished my 2nd ever 1/2 marathon. Now, I didn't do so well
> because my knee gave out on me... but still. This is a repeated
> experience, and it was much much easier, at least from the
> cardiovascular perspective. I would have done it in 9:45s I think...
> Maybe even 9's.... It felt great as far as the run itself... just the
> knee thing and the blisers sucked. But this opens up a certain can of
> worms a little wider.... the ironman.
>
> Just a thought: if my knee injury goes away and I am able to train....
> And if I can slowly over time turn up the intensity and length of my
> workouts a bit... To 2-3 hours a day, 5 days a week... I can now
> fathom doing an ironman. If I did an Ironman today, and I managed to
> last through it without an injury.... which you can't do unless you
> slowly condition your body to those great distances over time... then
> I would do at least as good as this woman (Sorry, this will sound like
> I don't think you did great, bib #1673. But I do think you did great,
> just that I'd be afraid to get your times because I'd never make it
> then... Don't think I have your willpower), from Ironman AZ:
> 1673 16:52:54 ATLANTA GA USA 32/36 W25-29 1792
> 34 1766 1:57:19 3:06 9:37 29 1729 8:10:29 13.7 10:37 28 1525
> 6:24:54 14:42
>
> Some analysis: there were only 36 women in my age group in that race.
> Wow, women are sort of weak in comparison to the men. I feel a duty
> here, to make at least contribute to the evening out of participation
> numbers! There were 91 men same age.
>
> Then, she finished the thing in 17 hours. Now I dunno if I can handle
> that kind of a duration, but the idea is, I should not attempt to do
> this till I can do it faster then her. Looking at her times... I can
> normally bike faster then 14 miles per hour. Now, can I do that after
> swimming 2.5 miles? Uh, probably not today, but later maybe. And then
> there's the run. Running a marathon at 15 minute miles... I think I
> will be able to do better then that. Again, not today, but down the
> line. I think my mile times would have to be around 8 minutes for me
> to attempt an ironman. Long way to go - need to shave more then 2
> minutes off, probably a lot more, since I've never done a full
> marathon. so why am I even talking then? Because I can at least fathom
> doing an ironman someday, something that would be an insane thought
> about 6 months ago!
>
> Let's pick on the swim for a second. I can now swim 3 miles... only
> problem is I stop and take breaks, and don't go fast. As it is, I
> think it would take me no more then 1.5 hours to do 3 miles. I haven't
> tried timing myself, but I will, soon as my swimming gets a bit
> better. I know I can do 3 slowly without getting too tired.
> Ironically, my swimming is closer to tri quality then my other stuff,
> even though 3 months ago it was nowhere near decent! 1.5K sunk into
> swimming lessons is paying off! (yikes). Biking a century - longest
> I've done was 30 miles. So this year I have to get up to 60, at least
> work in a few 60's into the summer. And the following year, I should
> complete an international distance tri... maybe even work up to 1/2
> ironman. Let's look at that now since that's a tad more realistic. Not
> by much, but a tad. How ready am I for that?
>
> Well, again, we have like 75 women and 300 men in the cali 1/2
> ironman. What's up with the ladies? I know that having babies puts us
> out of commission for a while and stuff, but a lot of the stay-at-home
> moms should have some time to train for triathlons instead of getting
> a fat butt?
>
> 1777 08:30:05 CA W25-29 71/74 55 1394 41:14 2:04 71 1846 4:53:41 11.4
> 71 1680 2:38:06 12:05
>
> Ok, so here we have the last woman in my age group that finished. She
> took 5 hours to bike 50+ miles slowly. At a pace of 11.5 mph. I think
> I can do better. Running the half... I did better with a bum knee.
> (ok, I know how legs feel after a brick or a tri, I'm just saying... I
> think I can now do better.). And the swim... well, I don't know enough
> to know if that's good or bad. I think her goal was just to finish.
> I'd want to be able to do at least a 15 mph bike, a 10 mph run, and
> not sure about the swim. So let's see how I'd've done....
>
> I think I would have been about here (slower bike speed over longer
> period... I think my bike speed would have been better...): 1602
> 07:13:19 CA W25-29 64/74 70 1772 50:38 2:32 63 1703 3:52:43 14.4 47
> 1119 2:05:37 9:36.
>
> Not too bad. Not too good. Come to think of it, I think I'd want to
> wait till I can do the whole thing in under 7 hours, more like 5 or 6.
> Something is just not right with working out for more then 6 hours.
>
> Now, let's look at this:
>
> 1875 203 05:01:17 CA W25-29 1/74 19 736 34:58 1:45 1 270 2:47:22 20.1
> 2 157 1:32:31 7:04
>
> this is what qualifies you for hawaii. I think that is out of the
> question for little me. :(. I don't think I'll ever be able to do 7
> minute miles. I've been struggling with getting down to even 8:30!
> But in all fairness, I might be able to get to a point where I can
> bike continuously faster then 20 mph... That would fix some of this...
> Because It would take 50 minutes of my bike time, and add like 20 or
> so minutes to my running time. Ok, so maybe... maybe some day.
> probably not, but there is a chance. If I can see finishing this thing
> in a year, and getting though it in 7 hours... when 6 months ago I was
> shocked at completing a super-sprint... then maybe in a year, I could
> see doing this, the half. And from that point on, maybe a full?
>
> So it looks like, the bike either makes you or breaks you. It's the
> longest, and your mph really adds time. A minute lag adds over 50
> minutes. I know I can maintain 16 mph no problem, and can do 18 for 10
> miles at a time. Not sure about the 56 miles. need to try.
>
> Just because I can...
>
